Regulation of Genomic and Biobanking Research in Africa

Updated: Jul 7, 2020

Regulation of Genomic and Biobanking Research in Africa: A Content Analysis of Ethics Guidelines, Policies and Procedures From 22 African Countries


Authors: Jantina de Vries, Syntia Nchangwi Munung, Alice Matimba, Sheryl McCurdy, Odile Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, Ciara Staunton, Aminu Yakubu, Paulina Tindana, and H3Africa Consortium


Abstract

Background: The introduction of genomics and biobanking methodologies to the African research context has also introduced novel ways of doing science, based on values of sharing and reuse of data and samples. This shift raises ethical challenges that need to be considered when research is reviewed by ethics committees, relating for instance to broad consent, the feedback of individual genetic findings, and regulation of secondary sample access and use. Yet existing ethics guidelines and regulations in Africa do not successfully regulate research based on sharing, causing confusion about what is allowed, where and when. Methods: In order to understand better the ethics regulatory landscape around genomic research and biobanking, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of existing ethics guidelines, policies and other similar sources. We sourced 30 ethics regulatory documents from 22 African countries. We used software that assists with qualitative data analysis to conduct a thematic analysis of these documents. Results: Surprisingly considering how contentious broad consent is in Africa, we found that most countries allow the use of this consent model, with its use banned in only three of the countries we investigated. In a likely response to fears about exploitation, the export of samples outside of the continent is strictly regulated, sometimes in conjunction with regulations around international collaboration. We also found that whilst an essential and critical component of ensuring ethical best practice in genomics research relates to the governance framework that accompanies sample and data sharing, this was most sparingly covered in the guidelines. Conclusions: There is a need for ethics guidelines in African countries to be adapted to the changing science policy landscape, which increasingly supports principles of openness, storage, sharing and secondary use. Current guidelines are not pertinent to the ethical challenges that such a new orientation raises, and therefore fail to provide accurate guidance to ethics committees and researchers.


Full text: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5289015/

7 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Sequence three million genomes across Africa

Ambroise Wonkam COMMENT 10 FEBRUARY 2021 Capture the full scope of variation to improve health care, equity and medical research globally. PDF version Two decades after the completion of the Human Gen

MADCaP Network
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
450 Brookline Avenue
Boston, MA 02215

Supported by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

MADCaP is grant-funded by the National Cancer Institute

© Copyright 2016-2020 

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

Use of MADCaP is subject to our terms of use and our privacy policy.

NCI_Stacked_COLOR.png
img-logo-2x-new.png